SolGold PLC Announces Constitutional Court Update
BISHOPSGATE, LONDON / ACCESSWIRE / June 21, 2019 / Further to the announcements on 30 May and 06 June 2019, SolGold confirms the Ecuadorean Constitutional Court has unanimously and definitively rejected the petition heard on 5 June 2019.
With this decision the petition has been closed and the case closed.
The Court rejected the petition on the basis of technicalities. The Court did not discuss, or rule on, the merits of the case. The formal resolution of the Court with further detail in to its rejection of the petition is yet to be published. SolGold will provide a further update in due course.
As advised in the Company’s earlier announcements, Constitutional submissions for a public hearing were received and heard in the Ecuadorean Constitutional Court on 5 June 2019 regarding the validity of the question proposed for a potential referendum regarding mining in the provinces in which SolGold’s 85% owned Cascabel project and other wholly owned exploration projects are located. Representatives from a large number of Ecuadorean government bodies, employees, regional community representatives, pro-mining groups, international mining groups as well as members of the community from Cascabel attended the hearing to demonstrate their strong opposition to the proposal. The Court heard arguments from many interested parties with the great majority opposing the proposed question.
The Cascabel project is a key project in Ecuador’s developing mining industry and a critical driver for the future of Ecuador’s economy in the view of the government. SolGold continues to receive full and objective support from the Ecuadorean government, who, most recently, publicly stated that Cascabel has the potential to become one of the world’s largest copper, silver and gold mines on 12 June 2019.
SolGold is committed to building an integrated explorer, appraiser and miner in the copper industry in Ecuador, and enjoys the support of its major shareholders, including Newcrest and BHP. SolGold is committed to the country’s economic development, provides employment and conducts responsible mining in line with local and international laws and standards.
SolGold recently announced findings from its Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) for the Alpala deposit at the Cascabel project in Northern Ecuador. The project indicated approximately US$17bn (at US$3.30/lb copper price and US$1,300oz gold price) in taxes, royalties and profit shares to the government and peoples of Ecuador.
The Company currently employs approximately 500 Ecuadoreans, and its staff is 97% Ecuadorean. The project will provide substantial and ongoing support for local, and a variety of, Ecuadorean industries and companies, and provide a platform for growth in the GDP of Ecuador. SolGold aims to replicate this project on other locations throughout the country as part of its plan to create a multigenerational company in Ecuador.
References to figures and tables relate to the version visible in PDF format by clicking the link below:
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/0060D_1-2019-6-21.pdf
CONTACTS
Nicholas
|
Tel: +61 (0) 7 3303 0665 +61 (0) 417 880 448 |
Karl |
Tel: +61 (0) 7 3303 0661 |
Anna Legge |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 3823 2131 |
Gordon Poole / Nick Hennis |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 3757 4997 |
Andrew |
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7907 8500 |
Ross
|
Tel: +44 (0)20 7418 8900 |
James |
Tel: +1 416 943 6411 |
Follow us on twitter @SolGold_plc
CAUTIONARY NOTICE
News releases, presentations and public commentary made by SolGold plc (the “Company”) and its Officers may contain certain statements and expressions of belief, expectation or opinion which are forward looking statements, and which relate, inter alia, to interpretations of exploration results to date and the Company’s proposed strategy, plans and objectives or to the expectations or intentions of the Company’s Directors. Such forward-looking and interpretative statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors beyond the control of the Company that could cause the actual performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from such interpretations and forward-looking statements.
Accordingly, the reader should not rely on any interpretations or forward-looking statements; and save as required by the exchange rules of the TSX and LSE or by applicable laws, the Company does not accept any obligation to disseminate any updates or revisions to such interpretations or forward-looking statements. The Company may reinterpret results to date as the status of its assets and projects changes with time expenditure, metals prices and other affecting circumstances.
This release may contain “forward‑looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward‑looking information includes, but is not limited to, statements regarding the Company’s plans for developing its properties. Generally, forward‑looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”.
Forward‑looking information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward‑looking information, including but not limited to: transaction risks; general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; future prices of mineral prices; accidents, labour disputes and shortages and other risks of the mining industry. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward‑looking information. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
The Company and its officers do not endorse, or reject or otherwise comment on the conclusions, interpretations or views expressed in press articles or third-party analysis, and where possible aims to circulate all available material on its website.
The Company recognises that the term “World Class” is subjective and for the purpose of the Company’s projects the Company considers the drilling results at the growing Alpala Porphyry Copper Gold Deposit at its Cascabel Project to represent intersections of a “World Class” deposit. The Company considers that “World Class” deposits are rare, very large, long life, low cost, and are responsible for approximately half of total global metals production.
“World Class” deposits are generally accepted as deposits of a size and quality that create multiple expansion opportunities, and have or are likely to demonstrate robust economics that ensure development irrespective of position within the global commodity cycles, or whether or not the deposit has been fully drilled out, or a feasibility study completed.
Standards drawn from industry experts (1) Singer and Menzie, 2010; (2) Schodde, 2006; (3) Schodde and Hronsky, 2006; (4) Singer, 1995; (5) Laznicka, 2010) have characterised “World Class” deposits at prevailing commodity prices. The relevant criteria for “World Class” deposits, adjusted to current long run commodity prices, are considered to be those holding or likely to hold more than 5 million tonnes of copper and/or more than 6 million ounces of gold with a modelled net present value of greater than USD 1 Billion.
The Company and its external consultants prepared an initial mineral resource estimate at the Cascabel Project in December 2017. Results are summarised in Table B attached.
The Mineral Resource Estimate was completed from 53,616m of drilling, approximately 84% of 63,500m metres drilled as of mid-December 2017, the cut-off date for the maiden resource calculation. There remains strong potential for further growth from more recent drilling results, and continue rapid growth of the deposit.
Any development or mining potential for the project remains speculative.
Drill hole intercepts have been updated to reflect current commodity prices, using a data aggregation method, defined by copper equivalent cut-off grades and reported with up to 10m internal dilution, excluding bridging to a single sample. Copper equivalent grades are calculated using a gold conversion factor of 0.63, determined using an updated copper price of USD3.00/pound and an updated gold price of USD1300/ounce. True widths of down hole intersections are estimated to be approximately 25-70%.
On the basis of the drilling results to date and the results of the Alpala Maiden Mineral Resource Estimate, the reference to the Cascabel Project as “World Class” (or “Tier 1”) is considered to be appropriate. Examples of global copper and gold discoveries since 2006 that are generally considered to be “World Class” are summarised in Table
A.
References cited in the text:
1. |
Singer, D.A. and Menzie, W.D., 2010. Quantitative |
2. |
Schodde, R., 2006. What do we mean by a world class |
3. |
Schodde, R and Hronsky, J.M.A, 2006. The Role of |
4. |
Singer, D.A., 1995, World-class base and precious metal |
5. |
Laznicka, P., 2010. Giant Metallic Deposits: Future |
Deposit |
Discovery |
Major |
Country |
Current |
Mining |
Inventory |
LA COLOSA |
2006 |
Au, Cu |
Colombia |
Feasibility – New Project |
Open Pit |
1 469Mt @ 0.95g/t Au; 14.3Moz Au |
LOS SULFATOS |
2007 |
Cu, Mo |
Chile |
Advanced Exploration |
Underground |
2 1.2Bt @1.46% Cu & 0.02% Mo; 17.5Mt Cu |
BRUCEJACK |
2008 |
Au |
Canada |
Development/Construction |
Open Pit |
3 15.6Mt @ 16.1 g/t Au; 8.1Moz Au |
KAMOA-KAKULA |
2008 |
Cu, Co, Zn |
Congo (DRC) |
Feasibility – New Project |
Open Pit & Underground |
4 1.3Bt @ 2.72% Cu; 36.5 Mt Cu |
GOLPU |
2009 |
Cu, Au |
PNG |
Feasibility – New Project |
Underground |
5 820Mt @ 1.0% Cu, 0.70g/t Au; 8.2Mt Cu, 18.5Moz Au |
COTE |
2010 |
Au, Cu |
Canada |
Feasibility Study |
Open Pit |
6 289Mt @ 0.90 g/t Au; 8.4Moz Au |
HAIYU |
2011 |
Au |
China |
Development/Construction |
Underground |
7 15Moz Au |
RED HILL-GOLD RUSH |
2011 |
Au |
United States |
Feasibility Study |
Open Pit & Underground |
8 47.6Mt @ 4.56 g/t Au; 7.0Moz Au |
XILING |
2016 |
Au |
China |
Advanced Exploration |
Underground |
9 383Mt @ 4.52g/t Au; 55.7Moz Au |
Source: after MinEx Consulting, May 1 Source: 2 Source: 3 Source: 4 Source: 5 Source:http://www.newcrest.com.au/media/resource_reserves/2016/December_2016_Resources_and_Reserves_Statement.pdf 6 Source: 7 Source: 8 Source: 9 Source: |
Table A: Tier 1 global copper and gold discoveries since 2006. This table does not purport to be exhaustive exclusive or definitive.
Grade Category |
Resource Category |
Tonnage (Mt) |
Grade |
Contained Metal |
||||
Cu (%) |
Au (g/t) |
CuEq (%) |
Cu (Mt) |
Au (Moz) |
CuEq (Mt) |
|||
Total >0.2% CuEq |
Indicated |
2,050 |
0.41 |
0.29 |
0.60 |
8.4 |
19.4 |
12.2 |
Inferred |
900 |
0.27 |
0.13 |
0.35 |
2.5 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
Table B: Alpala Mineral Resource Estimate updated effective 16 November 2018.
Notes:
• |
Mr. Martin Pittuck, MSc, CEng, MIMMM, is responsible for this Mineral Resource estimate and is an “independent qualified person” as such term is defined in NI 43-101. |
• |
The Mineral Resource is reported using a cut-off grade of 0.3% copper equivalent calculated using [copper grade (%)] + [gold grade (g/t) x 0.6] based on a copper price of US$2.8/lb and gold price of US$1,160/oz. |
• |
The Mineral Resource is considered to have reasonable potential for eventual economic extraction by underground mass mining such as block caving. |
• |
Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. |
• |
The statement uses the terminology, definitions and guidelines given in the CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (May 2014). |
• |
The MRE is reported on 100 percent basis. |
• |
Values given in the table have been rounded, apparent calculation errors resulting from this are not considered to be material. |
• |
The effective date for the Mineral Resource statement is 16 November 2018. |
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact [email protected] or visit www.rns.com.
SOURCE: SolGold PLC
View source version on accesswire.com:
https://www.accesswire.com/549434/SolGold-PLC-Announces-Constitutional-Court-Update